Archive for July, 2011
mathblogging.org’s weekly picks #22.
Consider a set of five objects. In fact, consider the “canonical” set of five objects: {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}. There are then ten ways to form pairs of these objects, as one sees from the following display: 04 03 02 01 14 13 12 24 23 34 . (Note that by “pairs”, I refer [...]
yesterday’s more verbose version.
the MEdZ logo indicates where the ten lines of the desargues diagram fall. one has ten such lines. also ten points. each line can be considered as a set of three points; similarly each single *point* belongs to three *lines*. in fact, we have a “duality” here… theorems about points-and-lines remain true when the words [...]
Photo 195, originally uploaded by vlorbik. a by-hand reduction of my desargues-space poster, with one less layer of redundancy (and the colors of the triangles reversed; also some cosmetic tweaks).
ten poles, ten polars, and ten pairs-of-triangles: ten ways to use one drawing (from MathEdZine, of course) to illustrate one theorem. (desargues’ theorem at w’edia.) performing calculations using actual blobs of color rather than alphabetical symbols *standing* for colors is time-consuming (and demanding of special tools)… but one literally “sees” certain things *much more readily* [...]
whenever anybody says anything like “this vision can only succeed if we all get on board and do our parts”… well, all i can hear is “this vision is doomed to fail”. there’s *no way* we’re all going to get on board… we all never got on board with *anything*. never have so far anyway. [...]
